Path to Creation Lord of the Rings Movies are stories of epic proportions in their own right. On the way to adaptation J. R. R. Tolkienbeloved trilogy, there have been many ups and downs, unexpected trips and companionships that have been made and shattered among Hollywood’s toughest minds. However, in the long list of “what ifs” leading up to production, few are as intriguing or suggestive as time. Peter Jackson ventured to cede his directing reins to the franchise to anyone other than Quentin Tarantino.

Peter Jackson, Miramax Films and Weinstein’s Wasteland

Image via Miramax

Peter Jackson initially sought to adapt Lord of the Rings in the mid-1990s, having risen to prominence in Hollywood with his successful 1994 feature film, celestial beings. Miramax Films (then led by Harvey Weinstein) distributed celestial beings and thus secured a preliminary contract with Jackson for his next project. When Jackson mentioned wanting to make Lord of the RingsMiramax was delighted to see that the film rights to the franchise were in the hands of a producer. Saul Zanzwho most recently struck a lucrative deal with a production company to distribute English patient.

COLLIDER VIDEO OF THE DAY

SCROLL TO CONTINUE CONTENT

Miramax received a license from Zaentz and pre-production began. It was originally planned to be a single. hobbit film followed by two films spanning the entire Lord of the Rings. hobbit the film flopped early on and they decided to just focus on two Rings movies. Like Peter Jackson and Fran Walsh worked on the script, and Weta Workshop began to develop the look of the project, the estimated budget continued to grow. Under the Disney umbrella, Miramax had a cap of $75 million per film. Lord of the Rings projected to cost somewhere in the $135 million range. Because of this, Weinstein insisted that Jackson tell the story as one single two-hour film.

Adapting three highly respected books into two films was quite a challenge. Cramming the whole story into one movie and doing justice to Tolkien would be next to impossible. Jackson wisely decided he couldn’t do the job under these conditions, and when Miramax learned of this, Weinstein issued a strange ultimatum. According to Agent Jackson Ken Kaminsas stated in the book Anything You Can Imagine: Peter Jackson and the Creation of Middle-earthHarvey told Jackson’s team, “You either do it or you don’t. You’ve gone. And I trained Quentin to lead it.”

How was Quentin Tarantino connected to The Lord of the Rings?

Uma Thurman in Kill Bill.  1 (2003)
Image via Miramax Films

Like Peter Jackson, Quentin Tarantino was the favorite independent filmmaker of the 1990s. Instead of releasing celestial beingsHowever, Tarantino made a name for himself in Hollywood thanks to Mad Dogs And Pulp Fictionare frankly violent films that caused controversy at film festivals and dramatically redefined the crime genre at the end of the twentieth century. Miramax distributed both Mad Dogs And Pulp Fiction, and the Tarantino-Weinstein partnership was becoming one of the most fruitful in Indiewood. When Weinstein threatened Jackson around 1998, Tarantino was in between releasing Jackie Brown and development Kill Billboth Miramax films.

It is unclear if Weinstein’s threat had any real weight or if it was simply meant to intimidate Jackson’s people. Other sources suggest the real next in line to direct Miramax Lord of the Rings was John Maddenwho just made a sleeper hit Miramax Shakespeare in love. Madden, with his penchant for romance and history, might have been a more rational choice for adapting Tolkien. Tarantino was (and continues to be) best known for strikingly modern cinema filled with dainty dialogue, intense action, and blatantly violent yet endearingly recognizable characters. If Tarantino is doing a period play, it will probably be set in the 1970s (although he’s gone as far back as World War II, the Old West, and pre-war America in the 1970s). Inglourious Basterds, Hateful EightAnd Django Unchained, respectively). A writer with a penchant for strong profanity and a director not afraid to strike, he’s certainly a phenomenal filmmaker, but usually offers a flavor quite different from what we’d expect from Middle-earth.

What would Quentin Tarantino’s Middle Earth look like?

Gollum smiles as he watches the Ring of Power in The Lord of the Rings The Return of the King
Image via New Line Cinema

Although Quentin Tarantino has never publicly commented on the possibility of him directing Lord of the Rings, the perspective raises countless imaginary questions. Will Tarantino stay true to Tolkien’s vision and tone, or will he offer the same brutal, action-packed food that he brings to his original films? To date, Tarantino has never made a film that hasn’t received a well-deserved R rating, but would tread into PG-13 territory for something as universally appealing as Lord of the Rings? Likewise, who would he choose? Tarantino likes to use many of the same actors in his filmography. Does this mean that we will Tim Roth Frodo and Harvey Keitel Gandalf? An Uma Thurman Galadriel and Sam L. Jackson Aragorn? Maybe, Steve Buscemi Gollum could be an interesting sight.

What seems certain is that without Peter Jackson, Lord of the Rings would never have found his image in New Zealand. With a Hollywood fanatic like Tarantino at the helm, the film could have been shot in California for a very different (and probably worse) aesthetic purpose. Similarly, with Miramax’s stipulation of one two-hour movie, this version Lord of the Rings much of the story would have to be skipped, regardless of the director, much to the loss of Tolkien fans and cinephiles.

Could Quentin Tarantino outplay Tolkien?

Elijah Wood in Lord of the Rings Return of the King
Image via Warner Bros.

On the contrary, although Quentin Tarantino may not seem like the most common directorial candidate. Lord of the Rings, he might have taken on the project with more seriousness than expected. As mentioned above, Tarantino is a stellar director and he really respects popular culture. His characters often reference and pay homage to old comics, TV shows and movies. He even started Star Trek movie for JJ Abrams in 2017, but the project was never implemented. As such, it wouldn’t be a complete surprise if Tarantino was also a Tolkien fan and sought to adapt the books with sincere appreciation.

After all, Peter Jackson was also an odd choice as a director. Lord of the Rings, and at the time, he may have been an even bigger gamble than Tarantino. except celestial beings and Jackson’s filmography, which preceded Lord of the Rings mostly consisted of low-budget horror films. Tarantino’s films may have been violent, but there’s almost nothing of Jackson in them. brain dead And Bad taste. Blood, splatter and camp were as much a part of Jackson’s early films as they were of Tarantino’s, but Tarantino’s box office was much more profitable. Before questioning Tarantino’s ability to transition from crime films to high fantasy, it’s worth remembering that just over a decade ago The Fellowship of the Ring came out, Jackson filmed fake dolls torturing and killing each other in Meet the weaklings.

Back and forth: Peter Jackson’s return to The Lord of the Rings

Galadriel kissing Frodo's hair in The Lord of the Rings The Fellowship of the Ring
Image via New Line Cinema

Of course, Peter Jackson did it all in the end. He made a deal with Miramax to shop Lord of the Rings from different distributors that could let him make two films. The project soon found its place at New Line Cinema, where Bob Shay agreed to not two, but three films to adapt the trilogy. From there, Jackson and Walsh reworked the script, adding Philippa Boyens eventually join the team. They scouted locations, selected roles and filmed all three films in a row in New Zealand. The result was flawless films that more than satisfied both critical and commercial aspects. By 2004 when Return of the King brought home a record eleven Oscars, no one doubted that Jackson was right for the job.

Meanwhile, it’s unclear if Quentin Tarantino ever realized how close he had (perhaps) come to directing. Lord of the Rings. However, he has been successful in continuing his independent path over the past two decades. He remains one of the most respected directors working today, and while he has never made a pure fantasy film to this day, his films have expanded in scope and scale throughout the twenty-first century. Jackson, on the other hand, returned to Middle-earth to direct hobbit trilogy in the 2010s and worked on all kinds of projects from the blockbuster remake King Kongto an independent film adaptation of the thriller The Lovely Bonesfor a groundbreaking documentary They will be remembered. Most recently, he directed a nearly eight-hour documentary series. The Beatles: Come Back on Disney+. Ultimately, both directors have made huge strides… while Harvey Weinstein is serving sixteen years in prison. Like ships sailing towards the white shores of the western horizon, everything ended happily.